Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: With the rising demand for psychiatric mental health services and the development of online technology, telemental health services are gaining popularity. Psychiatrists and psychologists differ significantly in service patterns and ethical models. This study investigated their ethical patterns and used the technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore how professionals’ attitudes influence their ethical and regulatory use of telemental health services. Methods: The online survey included their basic information, telemental health service patterns, attitudes toward telemental health services, and ethical norms. This cross-sectional online survey was conducted among psychiatrists and psychologists in China between April and October 2022. Of the 1071 respondents in the parent survey, 690 professionals who reported using telemental health services were included in the present subgroup analysis. Results: In some instances, practitioners offering telemental health services may not adhere to ethical standards, particularly in the case of psychologists. A significant proportion of respondents expressed concerns including potential emergencies, technical issues, and security, suggesting the need for a re-evaluation of the ethical framework. The TAM showed higher behavioral intention was associated with lower ethical compliance scores. Conversely, elevated subjective norms and perceived behavioral control have the potential to encourage ethical compliance. Conclusions: Telemental health services are widely used in China, but important gaps remain in ethical compliance and regulatory implementation. Future efforts should focus on strengthening professional training, improving platform security and emergency response procedures, and developing clearer institutional and professional guidelines for ethical telemental health practice.
Chang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.