This article will revisit the parliamentary debate in O ctober 1971 which took Britain into the E uropean Economic Community ( EEC ). It will show that both sides involved viewed the vote as a great matter of principle and invoked a number of B ritish traditions in order to justify their stance. Opponents of entry sought to portray EEC membership as endangering three great traditions: Cobdenite liberalism, B ritish internationalism and the UK 's ability to govern itself. Those on the other side of the argument rejected all three of these claims, viewing the choice for Europe as opting for an exciting future rather than clinging unrealistically to former glories, and claimed that they were acting in line with another central B ritish tradition – that of being a country that mattered and had a say when crucial economic and political decisions were being made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. Piers Ludlow (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: