Key result
Review outlines current anticoagulant guidelines, highlighting available tests for monitoring and urgent reversal.
Why the study?
The advent of newer oral and parenteral anticoagulants has created a knowledge and resource gap in clinical scenarios where urgent monitoring and reversal are necessary.
This review provides an overview of monitoring and reversal strategies for both traditional and newer anticoagulants.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform anticoagulant monitoring and reversal decisions; leaves open need for prospective validation of strategies.
In the past six decades, heparin and warfarin were the primary anticoagulants prescribed for treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism worldwide. This has been accompanied by extensive clinical knowledge regarding dosing, monitoring, and reversal of these anticoagulants, and the resources required to do so have largely been readily available at small and large centers alike. However, with the advent of newer oral and parenteral anticoagulants such as low molecular weight heparins, factor Xa inhibitors, and direct thrombin inhibitors in recent years, new corresponding practice guidelines have also emerged. A notable shift in the need for monitoring and reversal agents has evolved as well. While this has perhaps streamlined the process for physicians and is often desirable for patients, it has also left a knowledge and resource gap in clinical scenarios for which urgent reversal and monitoring is necessary. An overview of the currently available anticoagulants with a focus on the guidelines and available tests for anticoagulant monitoring will be discussed in this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McRae et al. (2021) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulants was evaluated. This review provides an overview of currently available anticoagulants, focusing on practice guidelines and available tests for anticoagulant monitoring and urgent reversal.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: