PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2008157 citations

Formal Models for Expert Finding on DBLP Bibliography Data

View Full Paper
HDHongbo DengKunming University of Science and TechnologyIKIrwin KingChinese University of Hong KongMLMichael R. LyuCalifornia Institute of Technology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Finding relevant experts in a specific field is often crucial for consulting, both in industry and in academia. The aim of this paper is to address the expert-finding task in a real world academic field. We present three models for expert finding based on the large-scale DBLP bibliography and Google scholar for data supplementation. The first, a novel weighted language model, models an expert candidate based on the relevance and importance of associated documents by introducing a document prior probability, and achieves much better results than the basic language model. The second, a topic-based model, represents each candidate as a weighted sum of multiple topics, whilst the third, a hybrid model, combines the language model and the topic-based model. We evaluate our system using a benchmark dataset based on human relevance judgments of how well the expertise of proposed experts matches a query topic. Evaluation results show that our hybrid model outperforms other models in nearly all metrics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deng et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1774918008e5848e6eab17https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2008.29
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Expertise modeling for matching papers with reviewers2007 · 265 citations
  2. 2Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information2004 · 743 citations
  3. 3A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval2017 · 2,544 citations
  4. 4An algorithm to determine peer-reviewers2008 · 85 citations
  5. 5Mining for proposal reviewers2006 · 109 citations