This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is recognized as a public health problem that has profound negative consequences for physical and mental health and well-being. Previous research has focused primarily on physical and sexual IPV; non-physical IPV has been understudied, particularly among men. Methods: Using data from Statistic Canada's 2018 Survey of Safety in Public and Private Spaces, we examined associations between non-physical IPV and nine heath status variables: fair/poor mental health, fair/poor general health, dissatisfaction with life, pain, use of medication, suicidal thoughts, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and PTSD. Results: Women (13.3 %) and men (12.6 %) were equally likely to report non-physical IPV in the past year, often without co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Bivariate analyses revealed that non-physical IPV increased the risk of reporting all negative health status variables except pain. When associations were examined in relation to the frequency of non-physical IPV, a gradient was observed. In multivariable analyses that controlled for potential confounders, most associations observed in the bivariate analyses persisted, but associations were somewhat attenuated when controlling for co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Conclusions: Non-physical IPV, particularly if it happens frequently, is strongly associated with negative health, often independent of co-occurring physical/sexual IPV. Longitudinal studies have found that non-physical IPV is a predictor of subsequent physical/sexual IPV, further increasing the risk of negative health. This underscores the importance of specifically addressing non-physical IPV through public health prevention programs and the need for it to be recognized as a form of IPV that is as important as physical and sexual IPV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shields et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: