A Critique of Australia’s G20 Presidency and the Brisbane Summit 2014

This article seeks to evaluate Australia as host of the Brisbane G20 Summit in 2014. The Australian G20 government, it appears, aimed to move the G20 from focusing on just responding to the financial crisis to a future growth orientation concentrating on structural reforms. To achieve this, Australia chose a narrow economic approach to the agenda. The Presidency sought to avoid engaging with broader security or climate change challenges. This effort to narrow focus and move away from a “war cabinet” approach met, however, with quite mixed success. A strong performance at the regulatory level, an emphasis on economic fundamentals and a place-branding approach to the Leaders’ Summit, all efforts of the Australian host, appear to have been insufficient for Australia’s G20 Presidency. Three additional factors seem necessary for a middle power like Australia to have impact on hosting the Leaders’ Summit: of substantial and effective political leadership; credible outreach narrative to citizens broadly that emphasizes the unique perspective of the Host; and serious investment in the troika style leadership of the Summit. essay raises questions over Australia’s leadership of the G20, and then examines important broader questions of G20 leadership concerned with this institution’s overall effectiveness and the success of the outreach efforts.