Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Some argue that operation and ownership of correctional facilities is a core responsibility of government. The historical record indicates otherwise. Private parties long played a central role in the administration of penal sanctions in Great Britain and the United States. By the twentieth century, government assumed operational responsibility for most adult correctional facilities. Privately owned or operated juvenile facilities in the United States have been more common and in 1989 held about 40 percent of all juveniles confined. Proliferation of private juvenile facilities did not reduce reliance on large public correctional institutions; confinement in public facilities rose over the past several decades. Privately operated correctional facilities for adults emerged with much fanfare in the mid-1980s, touching off a debate about the proper and constitutional roles of private and public agencies. Both research and experience are likely to show that private facilities can exploit specific conditions in specific jurisdictions and can deliver more cost-effective service in these places, but that claims of the private sector's inherent superiority over public correctional management will not be borne out.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas McDonald (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: