Key result
Transvenous lead extraction in adults with congenital heart disease achieved a 92% complete extraction rate, with lead duration and previous cardiac surgeries predicting extraction failure.
Why the study?
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and feasible in adults with congenital heart disease?
Observational (n=49)
No
Is transvenous lead extraction safe and feasible in adults with congenital heart disease?
Transvenous lead extraction is highly successful (92%) in adults with congenital heart disease, though subpulmonary AV valve regurgitation is a notable complication, especially in those with transposition of the great arteries.
Supports feasibility of transvenous lead extraction in adults with congenital heart disease; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification by lead duration and surgical history.
Background: Safety and feasibility data on transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in the challenging population of adults with congenital heart disease (A-CHD) are limited. Herein, we report the results of TLE in A-CHD during a 20-year period. Methods and Results: All consecutive TLE procedures in A-CHD were included in a monocentric prospective registry from 1996. A total of 121 leads were extracted in 49 A-CHD (median age, 38 years; 51% men) during 71 TLE procedures. Twenty-four (49%) patients had transposition of the great arteries. Main indications for extraction were infection in 34 (48%) and lead failure in 22 (31%). A laser sheath was required for 56 (46%) leads and a femoral approach for 10 (8%). Complete TLE was achieved for 111 leads (92%). In multivariable analysis, lead duration (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00–1.04; P <0.01) and number of previous cardiac surgeries (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.52–4.67; P <0.01) were predictive of TLE failure. No perioperative death or pericardial effusion was observed. Subpulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation increased in 8 patients (5 with transposition of the great arteries) and was independently associated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead (odds ratio, 9.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.31–71.64; P =0.03) and valvular vegetation (odds ratio, 7.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–40.51; P =0.02). After a median of 54 (19–134) months of follow-up after the first TLE, 3 deaths occurred independently from lead management. Conclusions: Despite complex anatomic issues, TLE can be achieved successfully in most A-CHD using advanced extraction techniques. Subpulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation is a prevalent complication, particularly in patients with transposition of the great arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gourraud et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Adults with congenital heart disease requiring lead extraction (n=49). Transvenous lead extraction was evaluated on Complete transvenous lead extraction. Transvenous lead extraction in adults with congenital heart disease achieved a 92% complete extraction rate, with lead duration and previous cardiac surgeries predicting extraction failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: