Introduction: Migraine is a neurological disorder with recurrent attacks characterized by headaches and sensitivity to stimuli. Stress is a significant trigger for attacks; however, molecular mechanisms of the connection are poorly understood. Objectives: To better characterize such mechanisms, we performed a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study with 51 participants (21 patients with migraine without aura and 30 healthy controls). Methods: Participants received a low-dose citalopram- or placebo challenge on 2 separate days. Prechallenge and postchallenge assessment of cortisol concentrations and transcriptomic changes using RNA-seq was performed from whole blood samples. Analysis of an accidental attack following the citalopram challenge was also conducted. Results: Neuroendocrine challenge elicited elevated cortisol concentrations at 30 ( P -value = 0.1355) and 70 minutes ( P -value = 0.07292) postchallenge in patients with migraine compared with controls. Gene expression analysis showed 10 differentially expressed genes (2 down- and 8 upregulated, P -value ≤ 0.005) and 10 dysregulated gene sets ( P -value ≤ 0.005). Among them, dysregulated IKBKGP1 and NKRF genes and upregulated protein synthesis and translation, carbohydrate metabolism, and, attack-related, glycosylation can be highlighted. Conclusion: Patients with migraine without aura showed an enhanced cortisol response to a neuroendocrine challenge. This was accompanied by a probable suppression of NF κ B activity through dysregulation of NKRF and an altered immune function. Upregulated carbohydrate metabolism may reflect the elevated cortisol concentrations' stimulating effects on endothelial glycocalyx, playing a role in NO-induced vasodilation, a trigger for migraine attacks. The results suggest the elevated cortisol response may trigger migraine attacks through altered glycocalyx and immune functions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: