Key result
Ultrasound surveillance of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms showed a low ruptured AAA risk of 0.03% per annum for small AAAs and 0.28% per annum for medium AAAs.
Why the study?
Most men screening positive have an AAA below the 5.5 cm treatment referral threshold and enter surveillance, but their risk of rupture remained to be determined.
What is the risk of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with small and medium AAAs under ultrasound surveillance?
Cohort (n=18,652)
Yes
What is the risk of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with small and medium AAAs under ultrasound surveillance?
Men with small and medium screen-detected AAAs have a very low risk of rupture (<0.5% per annum) under intensive surveillance, supporting the safety of the current referral threshold of 5.5 cm.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low rupture rates support current thresholds for men with small/medium AAAs; leaves open optimal surveillance intervals.
BACKGROUND: Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has commenced in several countries, and has been shown to reduce AAA-related mortality by up to 50%. Most men who screen positive have an AAA <5.5 cm in diameter, the referral threshold for treatment, and are entered into an ultrasound surveillance program. This study aimed to determine the risk of ruptured AAA (rAAA) in men under surveillance. METHODS: Men in the National Health Service AAA Screening Programme who initially had a small (3-4.4 cm) or medium (4.5-5.4 cm) AAA were followed up. The screening program's database collected data on ultrasound AAA diameter measurements, dates of referral, and loss to follow-up. Local screening programs recorded adverse outcomes, including rAAA and death. Rupture and mortality rates were calculated by initial and final known AAA diameter. RESULTS: A total of 18 652 men were included (50 103 person-years of surveillance). Thirty-one men had rAAA during surveillance, of whom 29 died. Some 952 men died of other causes during surveillance, mainly cardiovascular complications (26.3%) and cancer (31.2%). The overall mortality rate was 1.96% per annum, similar for men with small and medium AAAs. The rAAA risk was 0.03% per annum (95% CI, 0.02%-0.05%) for men with small AAAs and 0.28% (0.17%-0.44%) for medium AAAs. The rAAA risk for men with AAAs just below the referral threshold (5.0-5.4 cm) was 0.40% (0.22%-0.73%). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of rAAA under surveillance is <0.5% per annum, even just below the present referral threshold of 5.5 cm, and only 0.4% of men under surveillance are estimated to rupture before referral. It can be concluded that men with small and medium screen-detected AAAs are safe provided they are enrolled in an intensive surveillance program, and that there is no evidence that the current referral threshold of 5.5 cm should be changed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliver‐Williams et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=18,652). Ultrasound surveillance was evaluated on Ruptured AAA (rAAA). Ultrasound surveillance of men with small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms showed a low ruptured AAA risk of 0.03% per annum for small AAAs and 0.28% per annum for medium AAAs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: