Why the study?
Does the widespread use of intensive coronary care units improve case fatality rates?
Does the widespread use of intensive coronary care units improve case fatality rates?
The apparent decline in case fatality in coronary care units may be largely driven by the admission of milder cases rather than therapeutic advances.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questions coronary care unit benefits on case fatality; challenges consensus attributing declines to therapeutic advances rather than case mix.
Coronary care units are expensive consumers of scarce resources, and it is unfortunate that there has been little attempt to evaluate their achievements: even simple data relating outcome to age, duration of stay, and severity are not available. Indirect evidence is presented from the Hospital In-patient Enquiry and the national mortality reports for England and Wales. Over the period in which intensive care facilities have become widespread the hospital admission rates have risen steeply but numbers of hospital deaths have been stable. A part of this decline in case fatality has probably resulted from therapeutic advance, but most is probably due to the admission of larger numbers of milder cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G Rose (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: