It is suggested that cigarette consumption can and should be reduced by tax increases. As this contradicts a recent communication, the differences of analysis and the underlying models are discussed. Straightforward curve-fitting to serial social or economic data can be very misleading. If there is random drift, it is better to analyse consecutive changes of the parameters rather than their actual values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julian Peto (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: