Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strong institutionalized parties are often seen as vital for healthy democracies. The Indian case, therefore, represents a strange paradox: many parties are weak, corrupt and personalistic, yet democracy as a whole seems to be thriving, with increasing turnout and apparently strong popular support for democratic procedures and norms. This article explores some of the reasons for this strange outcome and suggests that the existing literature on party institutionalization might need some revision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steven I. Wilkinson (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: