Bayesian reasoning has been applied formally to statistical inference, machine learning and analysing scientific method. Here I apply it informally to more common forms of inference, namely natural language arguments. I analyse a variety of traditional fallacies, deductive, inductive and causal, and find more merit in them than is generally acknowledged. Bayesian principles provide a framework for understanding ordinary arguments which is well worth developing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin B. Korb (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: