Despite the recent academic efforts to develop Electronic Design Automation (EDA) algorithms for 3D ICs, the current market does not have commercial 3D computer-aided design (CAD) tools. Insteadpseudo-3D alternative design flows have been devised which utilize commercial 2D CAD engines with tricks that help them operate as a fairly-efficient 3D CAD tool. In this paper we provide detailed discussions and fair power-performance-area (PPA) comparisons of state-of-the-art pseudo-3D design flows. We also analyze the limitations of each design flow and provide solutions with better PPA and various design options. Our experiments using commercial PDK, GDS layouts, and sign-off simulations demonstrate that we achieve up to 26% wirelength and 10% power consumption reduction for pseudo-3D design flows. We also provide a partitioning-first scheme to partitioning-last design flow which increases design freedom with tolerable PPA degradation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: