Key result
Strict checking discipline and checklists help prevent systemic errors and never events by reinforcing teamwork.
Why the study?
To explore how engagement with checklists and adoption of a strict checking discipline help avoid unintentional individual, team, and systemic errors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Engagement with checklists and a strict checking discipline can help avoid unintentional errors and improve patient safety in clinical settings.
We explore how engagement with checklists and adoption of a strict 'checking' discipline help avoid unintentional individual, team and systemic errors. Paradoxically, this is equally important when performing repetitive mundane tasks as well as during times of high-stress workload. In this article, we aim to discuss the different types of checklists and explain how deviations from a 'checking' discipline can lead to never events such as wrong side or site surgery. Well-designed checklists function as mental notes and prompts in clinical situations where the combination of fatigue and stress can contribute to a decline in cognitive performance. Furthermore, the need for proactive discussion by all members of the team during the implementation of the surgical checklist also reinforces the concept of teamwork and contributes towards effective communication. Patient safety is often a product of good communication, teamwork and anticipation: a 'checking' mentality remains the lynchpin which links these factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoong et al. (2021) conducted a review in Patient safety. Checklists and checking discipline was evaluated. Adoption of a strict checking discipline and well-designed checklists help avoid unintentional systemic errors and never events by functioning as mental prompts and reinforcing teamwork.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: