Key result
Higher concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46-6.39) and peripheral artery disease.
Why the study?
Do elevated TRL-C and sdLDL-C concentrations associate with increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease in a primary prevention population?
Cohort (n=976)
Do elevated TRL-C and sdLDL-C concentrations associate with increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease in a primary prevention population?
Elevated TRL-C and sdLDL-C are strongly associated with future MI and PAD events independently of LDL-C and hsCRP, suggesting their cholesterol content drives atherogenesis.
BACKGROUND Elevated triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) and small-dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) particles are hallmarks of atherogenic dyslipidemia, and their cholesterol content is hypothesized to drive atherosclerotic risk. Prospective epidemiological data pertaining to cholesterol content of TRLs and sdLDL in primary prevention populations are mostly limited to coronary heart disease. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol (TRL-C) and small-dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) concentrations associate with composite and individual incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS), and peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS In a prospective case-cohort study within the Women’s Health Study, TRL-C and sdLDL-C (mg/dl) were directly measured in baseline blood specimens of case subjects (n = 480) and the reference subcohort (n = 496). Risk associations were evaluated for total CVD (MI, IS, PAD, and CVD death), coronary and cerebrovascular disease (MI, IS, CVD death), and individual outcomes (MI, IS, and PAD). Models were adjusted for traditional risk factors, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. RESULTS The risk of both composite outcomes significantly increased across quartiles of TRL-C and sdLDL-C. TRL-C was significantly associated with MI and PAD (MI hazard ratio [HR]Q4: 3.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46 to 6.39]; ptrend = 0.002; PAD HRQ4: 2.58 [95% CI: 1.18 to 5.63]; ptrend = 0.019), whereas sdLDL-C was significantly associated with MI alone (HRQ4: 3.71 [95% CI: 1.59 to 8.63]; ptrend < 0.001). Both markers weakly associated with IS. Association patterns were similar for continuous exposures and, for TRL-C, among subjects with low atherogenic particle concentrations (apolipoprotein B <100 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS TRL-C strongly associates with future MI and PAD events, whereas sdLDL-C strongly associates with MI alone. These findings signal that the cholesterol content of TRLs and sdLDL influence atherogenesis independently of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein, with potentially different potency across vascular beds. (Women’s Health Study; NCT00000479)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duran et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Incident cardiovascular disease (n=976). Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol (TRL-C) and small-dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) vs. Lower quartiles of TRL-C and sdLDL-C was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.46-6.39, p=0.002). Higher concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction (HR 3.05; 95% CI 1.46-6.39) and peripheral artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: