PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2020IEEE AccessOpen Access

Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networks for ECG Classification Using Generative Adversarial Networks

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does data augmentation using GANs improve the accuracy of CNN-based ECG classification in the imbalanced MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset?

Population

15 different classes of heartbeats from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset (lead 1 only)

Comparison

Data augmentation using Generative Adversarial… vs Training with the original unbalanced dataset…

Design

Other

Key result

Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (GANs) improved ECG classification by CNNs, achieving overall accuracy >98.0%, precision >90.0%, and sensitivity >97.7%.

Authors

ASAbdelrahman ShakerMTManal TantawiHSHowida A. Shedeed

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May enhance ECG ML research on imbalanced data; leaves open prospective clinical validation before practice use.

Structured PICO

Does data augmentation using GANs improve the accuracy of CNN-based ECG classification in the imbalanced MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset?

P
Population
15 different classes of heartbeats from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset (lead 1 only)
I
Intervention
Data augmentation using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) combined with deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (end-to-end and two-stage hierarchical approaches)
C
Comparator
Training with the original unbalanced dataset and other data augmentation techniques (random oversampling, SMOTE, ADASYN)
O
Outcome
ECG classification performance (overall accuracy, precision, specificity, sensitivity)surrogate

Using GANs to balance the MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset significantly improves the performance of deep learning models for ECG classification, achieving over 98% accuracy.

Cite This Study

Shaker et al. (2020) studied Arrhythmias. Data-augmentation using generative adversarial networks (GANs) vs. Original imbalanced dataset and other common data augmentation techniques was evaluated on ECG classification performance (accuracy). Data augmentation using generative adversarial networks (GANs) improved ECG classification by CNNs, achieving overall accuracy >98.0%, precision >90.0%, and sensitivity >97.7%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17baa28008e5848e6efb07https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2974712
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share