Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyzed bilateral finger prints of 3158 individuals from 13 Iranian populations of diverse origins, for digital patterns, using the topological method. Some male/female differences, and a great deal of heterogeneity in interpopulational variation was observed. Distance analysis, and the resultant dendrograms separated the populations studied, but the separation was not in agreement with the known ethnohistory of this region. Comparison of the obtained results with those based on the traditional methodology showed that the traditional methodology gives better results in measuring population distances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamali et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: