Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article re-examines the vowel system of Messapic, an Indo-European language attested from the sixth to the second century BCE in Apulia. Given the limited corpus of inscriptions, written in a local script derived from Greek, the phonology of Messapic remains difficult to understand. Through a critical reassessment of the literature and a first-hand analysis of vowel alternations, this study offers a new chronology for some sound changes: namely, it challenges the widely accepted theory of a prehistoric across-the-board * o > a shift, drawing the possible inference that this sound change was still on-going within the historical period; in addition, in exploring the synchronic values and diachronic developments of back vowels and diphthongs, particularly within key morphological classes such as the *- tor ‑ and *- on ‑stems, it suggests that the monophthongization of certain diphthongs may have triggered other sound changes. This approach offers a more nuanced understanding of the evolution of Messapic vowels and attempts to unify previous phonological models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bianconi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: