This article examines the Russian and Chinese perspective of soft power. It argues that Russia and China are not simply authoritarian states; rather they are authoritarian states of a specialised sub-category that share a joint legacy of adherence to a Communist experience which significantly informs their behaviour and sense of national identity. As a consequence, both the Kremlin and Beijing consider that the soft power methods of the West present nothing less than an existential threat, and conceive of a soft power policy as the outcome of state initiatives rather than the product of an autonomous civil society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeanne L. Wilson (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: