Key result
Restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage significantly reduced the risk of recurrent ICH (HR 0.180; 95% CI 0.055-0.586; p=0.004) and ischemic vascular events.
Why the study?
Antiplatelet medications involve a risk of re-bleeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, limiting their clinical application, so this study assessed the clinical effect and safety of resuming antiplatelet therapy in ICH survivors.
Does restarting antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent ICH and ischemic events in adult patients with spontaneous ICH who previously took APT?
Cohort (n=202)
Yes
Does restarting antiplatelet therapy reduce recurrent ICH and ischemic events in adult patients with spontaneous ICH who previously took APT?
Effect estimate: HR 0.180 (95% CI 0.055-0.586)
p-value: p=0.004
Restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with a reduced risk of both recurrent ICH and ischemic vascular events.
OBJECTIVE: Antiplatelet (APT) medications have been used to treat ischemic stroke and cardiovascular diseases. However, they involve a risk of re-bleeding, especially in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), which limits their clinical application. This study aimed to compare the incidence of recurrent ICH and ischemic events in ICH survivors on APT, as well as to assess the clinical effect and safety of APT resumption. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with spontaneous ICH at two tertiary medical centers between January 2011 and December 2020. We included adult patients with ICH who regularly took APT medications for various medical conditions. The patients were divided into two groups based on their APT resumption. Subsequently, we performed between-group comparisons of clinical or radiological characteristics; moreover, analyzed the incidence of re-bleeding and ischemic events, as well as the various risk factors for each event. RESULTS: We included 202 patients; among them, 118 patients restarted APT after initial ICH (APT resumption group) while 84 patients did not (no-APT resumption group). Compared with patients in the no-APT resumption group, those in the APT resumption group were more likely to have hyperlipidemia (p < 0.001) and a previous ischemic stroke event (p = 0.026). Recurrent ICH and ischemic vascular events occurred in 14 and 15 patients, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that the risk factors for recurrent ICH were older age, renal dysfunction, and no APT resumption; however, only renal dysfunction significantly increased the risk of re-bleeding in multivariate analysis (HR, 4.631; 95 % CI 1.432-14.977; p = 0.010). Moreover, previous cerebral ischemia and atrial fibrillation were positively associated with ischemic events in univariate analysis; however, only atrial fibrillation demonstrated a significant correlation in multivariate analysis (HR, 4.309; 95 % CI 1.383-13.426; p = 0.012). APT resumption had a significant prevention effect on recurrent ICH (HR, 0.180; 95 % CI 0.055-0.586; p = 0.004) and ischemic vascular events (HR, 0.240; 95 % CI 0.077-0.750; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that restarting APT in patients with ICH was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent ICH. APT can be safely restarted to prevent major thromboembolic complications in patients on previous antithrombotic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Intracerebral hemorrhage (n=202). Antiplatelet therapy resumption vs. No antiplatelet therapy resumption was evaluated on Recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.180, 95% CI 0.055-0.586, p=0.004). Restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage significantly reduced the risk of recurrent ICH (HR 0.180; 95% CI 0.055-0.586; p=0.004) and ischemic vascular events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: