Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that the concept of grounded theory, widely used in research in the human sciences, has not been adequately analyzed as to its structure as a theory. Analyzing grounded theory from predictionist and accommodationist views, as well as focusing on the issue of inference to the best explanation, it is concluded that this form of theorizing is basically accommodationist. Moreover, grounded theory, in terms of providing explanations, is simply a different version of a standard inductive argument. However, grounded theory’s strength lies in its potential to articulate a unique context and logic of discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: