Key result
Fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors offer a favorable efficacy and safety profile for preventing venous thromboembolism, a condition with an annual incidence of 1 per 1000.
Newer anticoagulants such as fondaparinux offer favorable efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness profiles for VTE prevention compared to older agents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors for VTE prevention; leaves open need for randomized trials versus LMWH.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the annual incidence of VTE is 1 per 1000. The individual risk for venous thromboembolism may be substantially higher and is determined by expositional and dispositional factors. Unfractionated heparin and warfarin have been the mainstays for the prevention of VTE until the early 1980s. Bleeding complications and side effects limited the use of these agents and subsequently low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) were introduced into clinical practice. These are most commonly used for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE today. In the last decade, the pace of development of further anticoagulants has accelerated with the introduction of new treatment regimens and new substances. In this context, novel drugs directed against clotting factor Xa (such as fondaparinux) and direct thrombin inhibitors (such as melagatran/ximelagatran) have been developed. Fondaparinux shows a favourable efficacy/safety profile and has been documented to be cost-effective compared to enoxaparin in the US and the UK.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bramlage et al. (2005) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. Fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors vs. Enoxaparin was evaluated. Fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors offer a favorable efficacy and safety profile for preventing venous thromboembolism, a condition with an annual incidence of 1 per 1000.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: