Key result
Prior telemedicine use links to an ~11% higher positivity score toward future care in CVD.
Why the study?
Telemedicine can support follow-up of cardiovascular disease patients at continuous risk, but patient attitudes, valued features, and willingness to pay needed investigation.
Does prior telemedicine experience improve attitudes and willingness to pay for telemedicine in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=231)
Yes
Does prior telemedicine experience improve attitudes and willingness to pay for telemedicine in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cardiovascular patients generally have a positive attitude toward telemedicine, particularly when it offers personalized care and is recommended by a physician, though they remain hesitant to fully replace in-person visits.
Prior telemedicine use was associated with more positive future attitudes in CVD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending prospective trials.
Introduction: Many patients with cardiovascular diseases are only seen by a physician once or twice a year unless urgent symptoms. Recent years have shown an increase in digital technologies to follow patients remotely, that is, telemedicine. Telemedicine can be supportive for follow-up of patients at continuous risk. This study investigated patients' attitude toward telemedicine, the defined features they consider important and future willingness to pay. Methods: Cardiology patients with various types of prior telemedicine follow-up or who never had a telemonitoring follow-up were included. A new self-developed survey was implemented electronically and took 5-10 min to complete. Results: In total, 231 patients (191 telemedicine [T] and 40 controls [C]), were included. Most participants owned a smartphone (84.8%) and only 2.2% of the total participants did not own any digital device. The most important feature of telemedicine cited in both groups was personalization (i.e., personalized health tips based on medical history, 89.6%; personalized feedback on entered health parameters 86.1%). The most important motivating factor for the use of telemedicine is recommendation by a physician (84.8%), while the reduction of in-person visits is a minor reason (24.7%). Only half of the participants (67.1%) would be willing to pay for telemedicine tools in the future. Conclusion: Patients with cardiovascular disease have a positive attitude to telemedicine, especially when it allows for more personalized care, and when it is advocated by the physician. Participants expect that telemedicine becomes part of reimbursed care. This calls for interactive tools with proven efficacy and safety, while guarding unequal access to care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knaepen et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=231). Prior telemedicine use vs. No prior telemedicine use was evaluated on Positivity score toward future telemedicine use (range 16-110) (p=0.001). Patients with cardiovascular disease who previously used telemedicine had a significantly more positive attitude toward future use compared to controls (positivity score 87.0 vs 78.3, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: