Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates CO₂ adsorption performance in nanocomposites, suggesting strong efficiency for carbon capture.
A nanocomposite adsorbent composed of nanocellulose, mesoporous silica, and polyethyleneimine was synthesized. Its CO₂ adsorption performance was evaluated. The structure of CNC/SiO₂/PEI was fully characterized using XRD, FTIR, zeta potential, FE-SEM, and BET analyses, which confirmed the preservation of CNC crystallinity, the successful incorporation of SiO₂, and the effective functionality of PEI groups. The effects of operating conditions on CO₂ adsorption capacity were investigated using response surface methodology. Maximum adsorption was achieved under the optimal conditions of 0.93 wt% PEI, 7 bar pressure, and 25°C temperature, yielding a maximum CO₂ adsorption capacity of 349.63 mg/g. Isotherm data were best fitted by the Langmuir model, indicating monolayer adsorption on the active sites of PEI, while adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model, suggesting a chemical mechanism via the amine groups. Reuse experiments showed that after 10 adsorption–desorption cycles, the nanocomposite retained 89.46% of its initial capacity. Only a small change in surface zeta potential was observed, indicating excellent structural stability. Overall, the CNC/SiO₂/PEI nanocomposite demonstrated high adsorption capacity, favorable kinetics, and excellent recyclability, showing great potential as an efficient adsorbent for carbon capture applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: