Evaluates impact resistance in fine-aggregate concrete using recycled rubber, suggesting benefits for reduced emissions.
The accumulation of end-of-life tires has become a critical environmental challenge, as most discarded tires are still disposed of in landfills, generating long-term risks to human health and natural ecosystems. Utilizing recycled rubber particles as a partial substitute for natural aggregates offers a practical approach to waste valorization while reducing the environmental burden of concrete production. This study evaluates the mechanical and impact-related performance of fine-aggregate concrete in which river sand is replaced by recycled rubber sand derived from processed scrap tires. Five mixtures were produced with a constant water-to-binder ratio of 0.35 and rubber replacement levels of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% by volume. A series of tests was carried out to determine compressive strength, flexural strength, rebound energy absorption, and impact resistance under both drop-weight and flexural loading. The results indicate that strength decreases progressively with increasing rubber content, with reductions of up to approximately 66% at the highest replacement level. In contrast, the energy absorption capacity increases slightly, from 4.69 J for the control mixture to 4.83 J at 40% rubber content. Among the tested mixtures, the 10% replacement level exhibited the highest impact resistance, suggesting a balance between ductility and residual strength. A simplified environmental assessment based on Global Warming Potential (GWP) indicates that incorporating recycled rubber can reduce CO 2 emissions due to the partial replacement of natural aggregates. Overall, the results suggest that rubberized fine-aggregate concrete may offer potential benefits for applications requiring improved impact performance and reduced environmental impact, although its use should be carefully considered in view of the associated strength reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: