PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyOpen Access

Polymer‐Coated Ceramics Versus Admixed Ceramic‒Polymer Feedstocks for Injection Molding: Rheological and Thermal Analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMonem MoktadirKMKrishna Sai Aparna MunjuluriHSHassan Soltani

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial investigates polymer-coated ceramic benefits over admixed compounds in injection molding, suggesting superior flowability and processing efficiency.

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the performance of polymer-coated ceramic powders with conventional admixed ceramic-polymer feedstocks in the context of injection molding.
  • Utilized thermally induced phase separation to prepare polymer-coated ceramic powders (PCCPs) using alumina and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT).
  • Measured viscosity, flowability, packing efficiency, and thermal stability of PCCP at 50% and 60% solids loadings.
  • Compared results with conventional admixed ceramic-polymer compounds prepared via melt-mixing.
  • PCCP showed a 54.1% lower viscosity at 1000 s ‒1 compared to admixes at 50% loading.
  • PCCP demonstrated a lower Hausner ratio of 1.15 versus 1.56 for alumina at 50% loading, indicating better flowability.
  • At 60% loading, PCCP maintained better rheological performance despite increased viscosity compared to admixed compounds.

Cite This Study

Moktadir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17db4d3fad632b0f9d8205https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.70819
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share