Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores LLM approaches for topic modeling MS discussions on social media, highlighting method effectiveness.
Despite advances in topic modeling, extracting coherent themes from short, noisy, health-related social media texts remains a methodological challenge. This paper presents a preliminary and exploratory empirical investigation of a prompt-driven Large Language Model (LLM) pipeline for topic modeling of 504 multiple sclerosis (MS)-related posts from Platform X. Two in-context learning strategies—zero-shot and few-shot prompting—were compared using GPT-4o-mini, with topic quality assessed through a multi-layered evaluation framework that leveraged GPT-4 for automated coherence and diversity scoring, complemented by human validation for coherence and document-level faithfulness. Within this experimental setting, few-shot prompting achieved the highest human agreement score (87.5%) alongside high coherence (4.9/5.0), while zero-shot prompting yielded the highest coherence score (5.0/5.0), with 79.2% human agreement. Both configurations demonstrated high thematic diversity (4.6/5.0) and produced themes largely judged as faithfully grounded in the source posts across the full corpus, with few-shot prompting demonstrating consistently stronger faithfulness and greater thematic stability. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that prompt-driven LLM pipelines — particularly few-shot approaches—show promise as a human-aligned and interpretable method for topic modeling of short, noisy, health-related social media texts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alamoudi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: