Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved reservoir-fluid identification and water saturation prediction, highlighting effectiveness in heterogeneous oilfields.
Accurate reservoir-fluid identification and water saturation prediction are essential for remaining-oil evaluation and water-flooding adjustment in heterogeneous oilfields. However, in the Youshashan Oilfield, southwestern Qaidam Basin, China, thin interbeds, strong reservoir heterogeneity, complex oil–water transitions, and inter-well logging-response differences make conventional single-task interpretation difficult. To address these problems, this study proposes a joint prediction method based on the Youshashan Fluid Prediction Network (YSF-Net) for six-class reservoir-fluid identification and continuous water saturation (Sw) prediction. A total of 200 wells were used and strictly divided by well into 140 training wells, 30 validation wells, and 30 independent test wells to avoid data leakage. Conventional logs were first processed through depth matching, outlier correction, robust standardization, and missing-value masking. Then, sliding-window logging sequences, regional stratigraphic embeddings, and reservoir-prior parameters, including shale volume, porosity, and permeability, were jointly input into the YSF-Net. The model uses a shared feature encoder with classification and regression branches to simultaneously identify oil layers, oil–water layers, water layers, and weakly, moderately, and strongly water-flooded layers, while predicting continuous Sw. A modified Simandoux-based physical consistency constraint was further introduced during training to improve the geological rationality of Sw prediction. Experimental results show that YSF-Net outperforms the CNN, BiLSTM, CNN-BiLSTM, and Transformer. It achieves an Accuracy of 0.926, Macro-F1 of 0.913, Macro-AUC of 0.968, Sw RMSE of 0.061, Sw MAE of 0.047, and Sw R2 of 0.947. In direct cross-well testing without fine-tuning, YSF-Net obtains a Cross-well Accuracy of 0.918, Cross-well Macro-F1 of 0.904, and Cross-well Sw RMSE of 0.064. Ablation, transition-boundary, and typical well-interval analyses further demonstrate that regional constraints, reservoir-prior inputs, multi-task learning, and physical consistency improve class-boundary discrimination and Sw prediction reliability. The proposed method provides an accurate, consistent, and practical workflow for intelligent reservoir-fluid interpretation in heterogeneous reservoirs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: