Evaluates collaboration and creative thinking in pre-service teachers, indicating positive outcomes with Augmented Reality integration.
<ns3:p>Abstract* Background Pre-service teacher education in Indonesian Islamic primary schools faces challenges in developing collaborative competence, creative thinking, and digital literacy. This study designed, validated, and evaluated the CoCreAL model, an instructional framework integrating collaboration, creativity, and Augmented Reality. Methods This study used a research and development approach based on the Dick and Carey instructional design model. The participants were 30 third-semester pre-service Madrasah Ibtidaiyah teachers at Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum, Jombang, Indonesia. Data were collected through diagnostic assessment, expert validation, practicality questionnaires, observation checklists, pre-test and post-test assessments, and student reflection journals. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Content Validity Index, paired-sample t-tests, and Cohen’s d. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Baseline assessment showed that 76.7% of participants scored below the institutional competency threshold. Expert validation produced a Content Validity Index of 0.94. The practicality score was high (M = 4.55, SD = 0.37). Paired-sample t-tests showed significant improvement in collaboration and creative thinking, with a composite gain of 29.7% (t = 13.04, df = 29, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.91). Thematic analysis identified collaborative engagement, creativity development, digital confidence, reflective awareness, and implementation challenges. Conclusions The CoCreAL model improved collaboration and creative thinking among pre-service Madrasah Ibtidaiyah teachers. The findings support the use of Augmented Reality as a pedagogical driver in teacher education, although future studies should use larger samples, control groups, and longer implementation periods.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asiah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: