PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Attribution, Surplus, and Governance: Extending Structural Indeterminacy to the Economic Domain

View Full Paper
RBRobert J. Blanchette

Key Points

  • The paper aims to extend the Structural Limit Theorem to the economic domain and explore its implications for governance.
  • Introduces and defines the Surplus Governability Condition, Non-Conversion Principle, and Attribution Prior Condition.
  • Maps new concepts against the five principal concerns of Magnifica Humanitas.
  • Demonstrates practical application through supplementary files like provenance records.
  • Establishes that surplus is governable only where attribution is resolvable.
  • Finds that accumulated surplus does not gain economic legitimacy without clear attribution.
  • Demonstrates convergence of structural requirements and moral frameworks across independent derivational paths.

Abstract

The Structural Limit Theorem establishes that causal attribution of system-generated output is formally indeterminate under the constrained intervention conditions typical of real-world institutional deployment. Prior work has mapped this result to legal and creative domains. This paper extends the theorem to the economic domain, where its implications have received no formal treatment. When any system — mechanical, algorithmic, or artificial intelligence — generates measurable surplus under conditions of attribution indeterminacy, that surplus is not merely maldistributed. It is structurally ungovernable in the absence of an explicit attribution prior condition. The paper introduces three concepts: the Surplus Governability Condition, which holds that surplus is governable only where attribution is resolvable; the Non-Conversion Principle, which holds that detected surplus cannot legitimately acquire economic standing through accumulation or metric visibility alone; and the Attribution Prior Condition as applied to the economic domain. AI systems are treated as the current and most urgent instantiation of a general structural problem that includes prior automation waves and any future system generating output under attribution uncertainty. The paper maps these concepts against the five principal concerns of Magnifica Humanitas (Leo XIV, 2026), demonstrating that the encyclical's moral framework and formal structural analysis arrive at convergent positions through independent derivational paths. The convergence is offered as epistemological evidence that the structural requirements identified are necessary rather than contingent features of the governance problem both frameworks address. The paper is published with its own provenance record — a Declared-Origin Gate declaration, Conception Event Anchor log, and AI-Assisted Work Admissibility Packet (supplementary files) — demonstrating in practice the Attribution Prior Condition and Non-Conversion Principle it argues for in theory. This is the fourth paper in a series extending the Structural Limit Theorem to specific governance domains.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robert J. Blanchette (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dbe93fad632b0f9d8a13https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20394642
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper