Scoping review summarizes genetic and epigenetic factors affecting COPD in Koreans, indicating research gaps.
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is influenced by environmental exposure and genetic susceptibility. Although large-scale genetic studies have identified loci associated with COPD and lung function, most evidence has come from populations of European ancestry, and data from Asian populations remain limited. Objective: This scoping review aimed to summarize KoGES-based studies on genetic and epigenetic associations with COPD and COPD-related lung function phenotypes. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, KoreaMed, RISS, KISS, and DBpia were searched from inception to April 27, 2026. Original studies using KoGES data to investigate genetic or epigenetic associations with COPD, airflow limitation, lung function traits, or longitudinal lung function decline were included. The review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Results: Of 20 unique records identified for final assessment, one conference abstract/preliminary report corresponding to a subsequently published full-length article was removed before screening. The remaining 19 records were screened, and 12 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most KoGES-based studies focused on spirometric traits, including FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and longitudinal lung function decline, rather than clinically defined COPD. Major approaches included genome-wide association studies (GWAS), exome array analysis, gene–environment interaction, polygenic/genetic risk score (PRS/GRS) analysis, epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS), and heritability analysis. Recurrent signals involved FAM13A and the 6p21/AGER region. Recent studies increasingly addressed longitudinal phenotypes, including rapid FEV1 decline and annual lung function decline. Conclusion: KoGES-based studies provide population-specific evidence on genetic and epigenetic associations with COPD-related lung function phenotypes in Koreans. However, evidence for clinically defined COPD, externally validated risk prediction, and integrative multi-omics remains limited. Future studies should distinguish spirometric traits, longitudinal decline, and clinically defined COPD while validating KoGES findings in larger Asian and multi-ethnic populations. Plain Language Summary: Why was this review done? COPD develops through a combination of smoking, environmental exposure, and genetic susceptibility. Most large genetic studies on COPD have been conducted in European populations, so less is known about genetic factors in Koreans. We reviewed studies that used data from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) to understand what is already known and what research gaps remain. What did the researchers do? We searched major Korean and international databases for studies that used KoGES data to investigate genetic or epigenetic factors related to COPD or lung function. We then grouped the studies by research type, such as genome-wide association studies, exome-based studies, polygenic risk score studies, interaction studies, and methylation studies. What did the review find? Most KoGES-based studies focused on lung function measurements such as FEV1 and FEV1/FVC rather than clinically diagnosed COPD alone. Repeated evidence was found for several loci, especially FAM13A and the 6p21 region. More recent studies have moved from cross-sectional analyses toward longitudinal outcomes, such as rapid lung function decline and annual change in lung function. Some studies have also begun to evaluate polygenic risk and its interaction with modifiable lifestyle factors. What do these findings mean? KoGES has helped improve understanding of genetic influences on lung function in Koreans, but important gaps remain. There are still relatively few studies on clinically defined COPD, externally validated genetic risk prediction, and multi-omics integration. More longitudinal and population-specific studies are needed to support future research on early identification, external validation, and prevention-related research questions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: