This review summarizes the research on the end effectors of agricultural harvesting robots (2010–2025) and extracts two core design principles. First of all, the selection of end effectors must follow the biological characteristics of fruits: rigid grippers are suitable for hard skinned and regular fruits; soft grippers can reduce the damage of fragile crops to a certain extent; suction cups are suitable for smooth, barrier free surfaces; the envelope type is suitable for soft and lossless picking scenes; the combined suction and grip design is more suitable for unstructured environments. Secondly, the separation mode should match the characteristics of the stem: motion separation (torsion/pull) is suitable for weak stems, while cutting is mainly used for hard stems. Unlike previous literature, this review provides a field deployability checklist (including dust/water proofing, cleanliness, maintenance, aging prevention, and aspiration prevention) to narrow the results of the laboratory and the real field environment. The three future directions of multimodal perception, variable stiffness driving and reinforcement learning are logically related to the analysis in this paper: multimodal perception optimizes the perception limit, variable stiffness solves the rigid–flexible trade-off, and reinforcement learning provides adaptive strategies for different crops. This framework can match the end effector design with the crop-specific field conditions.
Zhong et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: