PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of Nursing Management1 citationsOpen Access

When Caring Hurts: The Buffering Role of Social Support in Emergency Department Nurses’ Coping With Secondary Traumatic Stress

View Full Paper
YCYR ChenChang Gung University of Science and TechnologyYCYi‐Ya ChangChang Gung University of Science and TechnologyIWI.-Ting WangLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Key Points

  • This study investigates how social support and coping strategies interact to affect secondary traumatic stress in emergency department nurses.
  • Cross-sectional design involving 305 emergency department nurses from two tertiary medical centers
  • Utilized standardized questionnaires to evaluate secondary traumatic stress, coping styles, and perceived support
  • Conducted descriptive and inferential analyses including independent-sample t-tests and multiple regression for mediation analyses
  • 96.1% of nurses reported mild or higher levels of secondary traumatic stress
  • 63.3% experienced moderate-to-severe secondary traumatic stress
  • Avoidant coping was identified as the strongest predictor of secondary traumatic stress, with supervisor support partially mediating the relationship.

Abstract

Background Emergency department nurses routinely operate in fast‐paced and emotionally charged environments, where constant exposure to trauma places them at significant risk for developing secondary traumatic stress. Robust coping mechanisms and supportive social networks serve as critical buffers against these psychological effects. Aim This study explored how coping strategies and social support interact to influence secondary traumatic stress among emergency department nurses in Taiwan, emphasizing the mediating function of social support. Methods A cross‐sectional design was applied between June and August 2024, enrolling 305 emergency department nurses from two tertiary medical centers. Standardized questionnaires were used to measure secondary traumatic stress, coping styles, and perceived support from supervisors, peers, and family. Descriptive and inferential analyses—including independent‐sample t ‐tests, Pearson correlations, and stepwise multiple regression—were conducted to examine relationships among study variables. Mediation effects were examined with the PROCESS macro (5000 bootstrap resamples). Results Almost all respondents (96.1%) experienced at least mild or higher levels of secondary traumatic stress, and 63.3% reported moderate‐to‐severe levels. Avoidant coping emerged as the strongest predictor. Mediation analyses further demonstrated that supervisor support partially mediated the association between avoidant coping and secondary traumatic stress, whereas family support significantly mediated the relationship between emotion‐focused coping and secondary traumatic stress. Conclusion Secondary traumatic stress is widespread among emergency department nurses. Avoidant coping heightens susceptibility, whereas supportive supervision and family involvement can mitigate adverse effects. Implications Nurse leaders should develop programs that cultivate adaptive coping and enhance both organizational and family‐based support to strengthen resilience and improve care quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dc453fad632b0f9d8ff2https://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/8247254
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper