Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines spray particle control in ultrasonic nozzles, indicating feasibility of design improvements.
This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of controlling particle size through a mathematical model in the design of industrially applicable ultrasonic spray nozzles by utilizing the vibrational characteristics of piezoelectric ceramics. A piezoelectric ceramic composition with a low sintering temperature and excellent thermal stability (Curie temperature above 300 °C) was developed and used as a ceramic vibrator. Furthermore, the resonance frequency and nozzle displacement were calculated using the COMSOL program and applied to a mathematical model to design an ultrasonic nozzle capable of producing a spray particle diameter of approximately 30 μm. The designed ultrasonic nozzle was fabricated, and its spray characteristics were analyzed. The consistency of the spray characteristics was examined by comparing them with the mathematical model based on changes in ultrasonic nozzle length, resonance frequency, and fluid viscosity. When the ultrasonic nozzle horn length was 22 mm, the resonance frequency was found to be 42.1 kHz, and at a flow rate of 65 mL/min. the average spray particle size was approximately 30–40 μm, indicating fine and uniform particles. In addition, it can be seen that as the length of the nozzle horn increases, the resonance frequency decreases, reducing the supply energy delivered to the liquid, and the particle size increases as shown in the mathematical analysis. The theoretical separation energy required to atomize pure water at a flow rate of 65 mL/min. is 2100 J, which was found to be greater than all energy loss occurring during the atomization process. However, it can be seen that as the length of the ultrasonic nozzle increases, the maximum atomization volume increases, and as viscosity increases, the energy required to separate a single atomized particle becomes greater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: