PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology0 citations

68 Ga ‐ FAPI ‐46 PET / CT Versus 18 F ‐ FDG PET / CT for Pancreatic Cancer: A Feasibility Study

View Full Paper
NENicola EvansEPEbony PerkinsSFSepinoud Firouzmand

Key Points

  • Evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT compared to 18 F-FDG PET/CT in pancreatic cancer.
  • Conducted feasibility study with 10 participants (mean age 68 years) with suspected pancreatic cancer.
  • Participants underwent both 68 Ga-FAPI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging assessments.
  • Clinicians evaluated uptake, lesion detection, and diagnostic usefulness.
  • Mean SUVmax of primary lesions was 13.8 for 68 Ga-FAPI compared to 7.0 for 18 F-FDG in 9 identifiable lesions (P < 0.01).
  • 68 Ga-FAPI identified additional lesions in 3 participants, influencing staging.
  • FAPI was considered more diagnostically useful by clinicians in 5 participants.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of 68 Ga‐FAPI PET/CT in pancreatic cancer by comparing radiotracer uptake, lesion detection, and diagnostic value with 18 F‐FDG PET/CT. Methods Ten participants (seven male, three female; mean age 68 years) with suspected or confirmed pancreatic cancer underwent both 68 Ga‐FAPI and 18 F‐FDG PET/CT. Imaging was assessed for uptake, lesion detection, and diagnostic usefulness as determined by clinicians. Results Ten participants (seven male, three female; mean age 68 years) underwent imaging. Mean SUVmax of the primary lesion was higher for 68 Ga‐FAPI compared with 18 F‐FDG in participants with an identifiable primary lesion ( n = 9) (13.8 range 6.2–19.6 vs. 7.0 range 0.0–12.5). 68 Ga‐FAPI identified additional lesions in three participants, resulting in imaging‐based upstaging in three cases. Clinicians considered FAPI more diagnostically useful in five participants and equivalent in the remainder, based on comparison of lesion detection, delineation, and staging impact. Increased uptake was also seen in areas of presumed inflammation. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions This feasibility study shows that 68 Ga‐FAPI PET/CT is safe, demonstrates higher uptake than FDG, and can reveal additional lesions that influence staging. Imaging‐based upstaging was observed in three participants, supporting further investigation of FAPI as a complementary tool in pancreatic cancer imaging. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of 68 Ga‐FAPI PET/CT in pancreatic cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Evans et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dcbb3fad632b0f9d973ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper