Key result
High-dose spice and herb intake improves 24-hour blood pressure and reduces monocyte adherence.
Why the study?
Do spices and herbs improve cardiometabolic risk factors and microbiome composition?
Do spices and herbs improve cardiometabolic risk factors and microbiome composition?
Incorporating spices and herbs into an average American diet may improve cardiometabolic risk factors, including blood pressure and inflammation, and beneficially alter the gut microbiome.
This article appears as part of the supplement "The Role of Spices and Herbs on Supporting Healthy Diets and Improving Nutritional Status," sponsored by the McCormick Science Institute. Studies conducted at Penn State University to evaluate the effects of spices and herbs (S&H) on risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are summarized herein. We also report effects of S&H on phytochemical metabolites and the microbiome. Results demonstrate beneficial effects of S&H on postprandial endothelial function, insulin and triglycerides, pancreatic lipase, inflammatory markers, and measures of oxidative defense. In a controlled-feeding trial that evaluated 3 doses of S&H (0.5, 3.3, and 6.6 g/d per 2100 kcal) in the context of an average American diet, the high-S&H diet improved 24-hour blood pressure after 4 weeks, the moderate-S&H diet decreased proinflammatory cytokines, and the high-S&H diet reduced monocyte adherence. Our research also identified polyphenol metabolites that may have important functional properties for CVD risk reduction. Finally, we report benefits of S&H on gut bacterial composition, which suggests possible benefits on CVD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kris‐Etherton et al. (2025) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease risk factors. Spices and herbs vs. Average American diet was evaluated. A high-spice and herb diet (6.6 g/d) improved 24-hour blood pressure and reduced monocyte adherence after 4 weeks, while a moderate dose decreased proinflammatory cytokines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: