Examines vibration reduction in commercial vehicles using advanced control techniques, indicating improved ride comfort.
To address the vibration reduction problem of the six-degrees of freedom(6-DOF) half-vehicle model and to improve ride comfort and handling stability, a piezoelectric stack actuator based on the inverse piezoelectric effect was introduced. A 6-DOF half-vehicle dynamic model coupling the cab, body, and wheels was established based on the Lagrange equation. Based on this model, a vertical-pitch dual sliding surface RBF neural network sliding mode control strategy was proposed, with two independent RBF neural networks designed to separately approximate, online, the comprehensive uncertainties in the vertical and pitch channels associated with unmodeled dynamics, external disturbances, and modeling simplifications. The variable-speed reaching law (dsat) function was used to design the sliding mode reaching law, balancing sliding surface convergence speed and vibration suppression. Six indicators, including vertical acceleration of the cab and vertical acceleration of the vehicle body, were selected as performance evaluation metrics to establish the fitness function. Combined with a genetic algorithm, the dual sliding surface coefficients, RBF network parameters, adaptive update rates, and variable-speed reaching law parameters were globally optimized. The vibration reduction effects of four schemes—passive control, traditional sliding mode control, RBF sliding mode control, and genetic algorithm optimized RBF dual-sliding-mode control—were compared and analyzed. Simulation results show that the genetic algorithm optimized RBF dual-sliding-mode control achieves improved vibration suppression in several key ride-comfort-related indices and provides better overall coordination among ride comfort, suspension working space, and tire dynamic deflection. The research results validate the effectiveness of this method and provide a new solution for addressing vehicle vibration reduction problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: