Prospective cross-sectional study evaluates vestibular function in healthy pregnant women, indicating stability throughout pregnancy.
Background/Objectives: Pregnancy involves significant hormonal, cardiovascular, and physiological shifts that may potentially affect the vestibular system. The utricle and saccule, the two primary otolith organs, are responsible for detecting linear acceleration and maintaining equilibrium. This study aims to objectively evaluate the functional status of these organs throughout the three trimesters of pregnancy using Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs). Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 64 healthy primigravida women (mean age 29.4 ± 2.3 years). Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) tests were performed at three distinct time points: the first (8–9 weeks), second (20–21 weeks), and third (33–34 weeks) trimesters. Latencies (p13 and n23 for cVEMP; n10 and p15 for oVEMP) and peak-to-peak amplitudes were recorded and statistically compared across trimesters. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in cVEMP p13 and n23 latencies or amplitudes across the three trimesters (p > 0.05). Similarly, oVEMP p15 latencies and amplitudes remained stable throughout the pregnancy (p = 0.43 and p = 0.95, respectively). While a slight numerical increase in certain latencies was observed in the third trimester, and the oVEMP n10 latency was found to be consistently prolonged compared to non-pregnant norms, these values remained stable between trimesters. The inter-aural asymmetry showed no significant deviations, indicating a balanced vestibular adaptation. Conclusions: The functional integrity of the saccule and utricle is preserved during a healthy pregnancy. Despite the dramatic increase in gestational hormones such as estrogen and progesterone, the otolith-dependent reflex pathways (vestibulocollic and vestibulo-ocular) remain resilient. These results provide a clinical baseline for evaluating vestibular symptoms in pregnant populations, suggesting that significant VEMP abnormalities should prompt investigation into underlying vestibular pathologies rather than being attributed to normal pregnancy changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: