Why the study?
Clinical outcomes after infrapopliteal revascularization in CLTI are not always fully explained by anatomical target-artery alignment alone under the angiosome concept.
Does anatomical revascularization pattern (direct, indirect, or mixed) affect wound healing and limb salvage in patients with CLTI?
Cohort (n=51)
Does anatomical revascularization pattern (direct, indirect, or mixed) affect wound healing and limb salvage in patients with CLTI?
Anatomical angiosome classification alone may not fully explain clinical outcomes in CLTI, highlighting the potential utility of a wound-oriented conceptual framework.
Background/Objectives: The angiosome concept is widely used to guide infrapopliteal revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, clinical outcomes are not always fully explained by anatomical target-artery alignment alone. The present study aimed to revisit a previously published angiosome-based cohort through a wound-oriented conceptual perspective and to explore whether perfusion heterogeneity may help contextualize variability in clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective secondary analysis included 51 patients with CLTI who underwent infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization. Patients were originally classified as direct, indirect, or mixed revascularization according to angiosome-based criteria. The present study represents an exploratory conceptual reinterpretation of the original dataset. No new variables were introduced, and the woundosome concept was not operationalized as a measurable patient-level variable. Statistical analyses were exploratory and descriptive in nature. Results: High rates of wound healing and limb salvage were observed across all revascularization patterns at 12 months. Within the limitations of this small exploratory cohort, no consistent detectable differences in clinical outcomes were observed across anatomical revascularization patterns. Stratification according to the number of affected angiosomes did not reveal clear outcome differences. The findings suggest that factors beyond anatomical target-artery alignment may contribute to wound healing variability in CLTI. Conclusions: The present study does not establish a validated wound-oriented perfusion model but highlights the limitations of relying exclusively on anatomical angiosome classification when interpreting clinical outcomes in CLTI. In this context, the woundosome may serve as a descriptive and hypothesis-generating conceptual framework for discussing perfusion heterogeneity and wound-level perfusion complexity. Prospective studies integrating objective perfusion assessment and standardized wound evaluation are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popitiu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (n=51). Infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization vs. Different anatomical revascularization patterns (direct, indirect, or mixed) was evaluated on Wound healing and limb salvage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: