Quantifies environmental impact of solid oxide fuel cell manufacturing, highlighting areas for improvement.
Coal has been Malaysia’s primary energy source for electricity generation for the past few decades, resulting in increased greenhouse gas emissions and irreversible environmental damage. Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs) have emerged as a viable clean-energy alternative to mitigate these environmental effects. There has been significant emphasis on developing pollution-free technology, with limited attention given to the environmental impact of SOFC. Research and development efforts have primarily focused on the design and technical aspects of SOFC. Prior to the introduction of SOFC to market, quantifying the environmental footprint of SOFC manufacturing is necessary to support a sustainable energy transition. This study conducts a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of SOFC manufacturing in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards. The analysis focuses on a planar electrolyte-supported SOFC with a lifespan of 4.57 years, using a functional unit of 1 kWh electrical output. The Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 method implemented in GaBi Software was used for the impact assessment. Key environmental impact categories considered in the LCA include Climate Change (CC), Acidification Potential (AP), Eutrophication Potential (EP), Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP), Photochemical Ozone Formation (POF), and Human Toxicity Potential (HTP). The total climate change impact is approximately 19.674 kg CO2 eq./kWh, with the Balance of Plant (BoP) phase contributing 91% of this impact, while the fuel cell stack phase contributes 1.25%. The study identifies key areas for improvement, primarily related to BoP and other high-impact processes, and emphasizes the importance of targeted measures to effectively reduce the environmental impacts associated with SOFC manufacturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naimin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: