Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theorem-by-theorem assessment confirms A1-dS does not compromise existing results, suggesting alignment.
NT10 established A1-dS: a non-perturbative extension of Axiom A1 valid for all Lambda_5 > 0 under brane confinement y_n < y_H. This note assesses, theorem by theorem, whether A1-dS compromises any result already established in the corpus. Main finding: no theorem needs to be retracted or structurally revised. Five theorems are ROBUST, three require domain restriction only, and one (T4) requires its proof rewritten with the exact de Sitter warp factor. A1-dS does not break the COCM; it rewrites the corpus locally within its natural domain and leaves the main logical architecture intact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Luis Vázquez González (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: