Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines EBV-specific T-cell responses post liver transplantation in children, suggesting predictive value for infection risk.
To determine Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-specific T-cell responses after pediatric liver transplantation (LT), we monitored EBV viral load and IFNγ-producing specific T-cells reacting to BZLF1, EBNA1, and LMP2 antigens from peripheral immune cells before LT until 48 weeks after LT. Among forty children, seven (17.5%) developed EBV infection. Two were subsequently diagnosed with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. The infected children exhibited fewer EBNA1-specific CD4 + T-cells and CD8 + T-cells before LT (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) than non-infected children. At 32 weeks after LT, EBNA1-specific CD4 + T-cells, LMP2-specific CD4 + T-cells, and BZLF1-specific CD8 + T-cells were lower in the infected children (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). EBV infection-free survival rates (IFSR) were higher in groups with detected EBNA1-specific CD4 + or CD8 + T-cells prior to LT compared to non-detected group. No patients with detected EBNA1-specific CD8 + T-cells reported EBV infection after LT (a 48-week IFSR of 100%). However, the differences of IFSR were statistically insignificant (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.3, and HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.09 to 1.86, respectively). LMP2-specific CD4 + T-cells were negatively correlated with EBV viral load (r = − 0.702, P = 0.02). In conclusion, EBV infection after pediatric LT is associated with lower expression of EBV-specific T-cells, which may be potential predictors for the infection after LT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Getsuwan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: