Evaluates vitamin D metabolites in cats with chronic kidney disease, suggesting implications for treatment decisions.
Objective: To characterize comprehensive vitamin D metabolite profiles in cats with chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to healthy cats. Methods: Thirty-three healthy cats and 66 cats with CKD (6 IRIS Stage 1, 36 IRIS Stage 2, 18 IRIS Stage 3, 6 IRIS Stage 4) were prospectively enrolled. Serum vitamin D metabolites, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25[OH]D3), 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitain D3 (3-epi-25[OH]D3), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25[OH]2D3; calcitriol), and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (24,25[OH]2D3) were analyzed via LC-MS/MS. Vitamin D metabolites, clinicopathologic parameters, age, body weight and body condition score were compared between groups using a Mann Whitney test or t test as appropriate. Correlations between Vitamin D metabolites and clinicopathologic parameters, age and weight were assessed using Spearman rank test. Results: There was no significant difference in any vitamin D metabolite between groups. Median (range) 25(OH)D3 concentrations in cats with CKD and healthy cats were 28.9 ng/mL (12.2-68.8) and 26.3 ng/mL (11.5-55.9), respectively. Median (range) 3-epi-25(OH)D3 concentrations in cats with CKD and healthy cats were 9.1 ng/mL (2.2-30.4) and 7.2 ng/mL (1.9-22.9), respectively. Median (range) calcitriol concentrations in cats with CKD and healthy cats were 141.3 pg/mL (38.6-367.8) and 127.9 pg/mL (71.5-235.8), respectively. Median (range) 24,25(OH)2D3 concentrations in cats with CKD and healthy cats were 9.8 ng/mL (2.5-32.5) and 8.8 ng/mL (1.2-38.4) respectively. There was no correlation between any vitamin D metabolite and age or serum creatinine concentration, and no correlation between 25(OH)D and hematocrit, blood pressure, or urine protein:creatinine ratio. Conclusions and relevance: Vitamin D metabolites were not significantly different in cats with CKD which could have implications for recommendations regarding calcitriol supplementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
parker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: