Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates creep-fatigue in high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, suggesting some methods may be overly conservative.
The high temperature gas-cooled reactor is a generation IV reactor design, operating at helium outlet temperatures of 700–950 °C and pressures typically between 4 and 7 MPa. Under such conditions, creep-fatigue becomes a critical failure mode, driven by high-temperature exposure and thermo-mechanical load fluctuations. This study applies the creep-fatigue damage evaluation rules of ASME BPVC Section III Division 5, and Code Cases N-862 and N-898 to an Intermediate Heat Exchanger vessel, modelled on the Japanese High Temperature Test Reactor. A finite element model was developed, and a coupled thermo-mechanical analysis was performed for a representative loading sequence. Three code-permitted procedures — (i) elastic, (ii) inelastic, and (iii) elastic-perfectly plastic — were applied to the same loading sequence to quantify creep-fatigue damage and the corresponding allowable lifetimes. The elastic, inelastic, and elastic-perfectly plastic methodologies predicted lifetimes of 21, 80, and 6,005 cycles, respectively. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between the inelastic and elastic-perfectly plastic predictions are discussed, including the effects of cyclic hardening and the factor . Overall, the study clarifies the differences among ASME BPVC creep-fatigue evaluation methodologies and indicates that some approaches may yield overly conservative lifetime predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: