PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1998European Journal of Social Theory136 citations

The Narcissism of Minor Differences

View Full Paper
ABAnton Blok

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This essay explores the theoretical implications of Freud's notion of `the narcissism of minor differences' - the idea that it is precisely the minor differences between people who are otherwise alike that form the basis of feelings of strangeness and hostility between them. A comparative survey shows that minor differences underlie a wide range of conflicts: from relatively benign forms of campanilismo to bloody civil wars. Freud's tentative statements link up with the insights of Simmel, Durkheim, Lévi-Strauss, Dumont, Elias, and Girard. Especially helpful is what Bourdieu writes in Distinction: social identity lies in difference, and difference is asserted against what is closest, which represents the greatest threat. An outline of a general theory of power and violence should include consideration of the narcissism of minor differences, also because its counterpart - hierarchy and great differences - makes for relative stability and peace.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anton Blok (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17df38d990e918e6b49ee2https://doi.org/10.1177/136843198001001004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper