PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2023Journal of General Internal Medicine67 citationsOpen Access

Veterans Health Administration (VA) vs. Non-VA Healthcare Quality: A Systematic Review

EAEric ApaydinNPNeil M. PaigeMBMeron M. Begashaw

Key Result

Veterans Health Administration (VA) care is consistently as good as or better than non-VA care in terms of clinical quality and safety, while access, cost, and patient experience outcomes are mixed.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review (n=37)

Structured PICO

Does healthcare provided in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) system improve clinical quality, safety, access, patient experience, and cost/efficiency compared to non-VA settings?

P
Population
Patients receiving healthcare in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) system or non-VA settings (37 included studies published 2015-2023).
I
Intervention
Healthcare provided in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) system
C
Comparator
Healthcare provided in non-VA settings (including VA-paid community care, Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance)
O
Outcome
Clinical quality, safety, access, patient experience, efficiency (cost), or equity outcomes

VA care is consistently as good as or better than non-VA care in terms of clinical quality and safety, while access and cost outcomes are mixed.

Limitations

  • Possibility of publication bias or subconscious investigator bias, as most of the published studies were written by VA authors
  • Possibility of confounding by patient populations in VA or non-VA care, as VA patients generally have worse unmeasured social determinants of health
  • Limited by how different stakeholders may value the included outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) serves Veterans in the nation's largest integrated healthcare system. VA seeks to provide high quality of healthcare to Veterans, but due to the VA Choice and MISSION Acts, VA increasingly pays for care outside of its system in the community. This systematic review compares care provided in VA and non-VA settings, and includes published studies from 2015 to 2023, updating 2 prior systematic reviews on this topic. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PsychINFO from 2015 to 2023 for published literature comparing VA and non-VA care, including VA-paid community care. Records were included at the abstract or full-text level if they compared VA medical care with care provided in other healthcare systems, and included clinical quality, safety, access, patient experience, efficiency (cost), or equity outcomes. Data from included studies was abstracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Results were synthesized narratively and via graphical evidence maps. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included after screening 2415 titles. Twelve studies compared VA and VA-paid community care. Most studies assessed clinical quality and safety, and studies of access were second most common. Only six studies assessed patient experience and six assessed cost or efficiency. Clinical quality and safety of VA care was better than or equal to non-VA care in most studies. Patient experience in VA care was better than or equal to experience in non-VA care in all studies, but access and cost/efficiency outcomes were mixed. DISCUSSION: VA care is consistently as good as or better than non-VA care in terms of clinical quality and safety. Access, cost/efficiency, and patient experience between the two systems are not well studied. Further research is needed on these outcomes and on services widely used by Veterans in VA-paid community care, like physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Apaydin et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Healthcare quality (n=37). Veterans Health Administration (VA) care vs. Non-VA healthcare (including VA-paid community care) was evaluated on Clinical quality and safety. Veterans Health Administration (VA) care is consistently as good as or better than non-VA care in terms of clinical quality and safety, while access, cost, and patient experience outcomes are mixed.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17e53f8008e5848e6f2e2chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08207-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of Dual Use of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Part D Drug Benefits on Antihypertensive Medication Supply in a National Cohort of Veterans with Dementia2018 · 15 citations
  2. 2Survival among Veterans Obtaining Dialysis in VA and Non-VA Settings2018 · 20 citations
  3. 3Association Between Guideline-Discordant Prostate Cancer Imaging Rates and Health Care Service Among Veterans and Medicare Recipients2018 · 8 citations
  4. 4Aggressive End-of-Life Care in the Veterans Health Administration versus Fee-for-Service Medicare among Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer2022 · 3 citations
  5. 5Poststroke Rehabilitation and Restorative Care Utilization2016 · 8 citations