Key result
Intensive antiplatelet therapy increases major or fatal bleeding ~121% vs guideline therapy in stroke or TIA.
Why the study?
Intensive antiplatelet therapy increased the frequency and severity of bleeding in the TARDIS trial, motivating an investigation into the predictors of bleeding and its association with outcome.
Does intensive triple antiplatelet therapy increase the frequency and severity of bleeding compared to guideline-based antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia?
RCT (n=3,096)
Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does intensive triple antiplatelet therapy increase the frequency and severity of bleeding compared to guideline-based antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute cerebral ischaemia?
Intensive triple antiplatelet therapy in acute ischaemic stroke or TIA significantly increases the risk of major and fatal bleeding compared to guideline-directed therapy without improving efficacy.
Avoid intensive triple antiplatelet therapy in acute stroke or TIA due to excess major bleeding; RCT confirms net harm.
Intensive antiplatelet therapy did not reduce recurrent stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) events as compared with guideline treatment in the Triple Antiplatelets for Reducing Dependency after Ischaemic Stroke (TARDIS) trial, but did increase the frequency and severity of bleeding. In this pre-specified analysis, we investigated predictors of bleeding and the association of bleeding with outcome. TARDIS was an international prospective randomised open-label blinded-endpoint trial in participants with ischaemic stroke or TIA within 48 h of onset. Participants were randomised to 30 days of intensive antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole) or guideline-based therapy (either clopidogrel alone or combined aspirin and dipyridamole). Bleeding was defined using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis five-level ordered categorical scale: fatal, major, moderate, minor, none. Of 3,096 participants, bleeding severity was: fatal 0.4%, major 1.5%, moderate 1.2%, minor 11.4%, none 85.5%. Major/fatal bleeding was increased with intensive as compared with guideline therapy: 39 vs. 17 participants, adjusted hazard ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.24-3.93, p = 0.007. Bleeding events diverged between treatment groups in the 8-35 day period but not in the 0-7 or 36-90 day epochs. In multivariate analysis more, and more severe, bleeding events were seen with increasing age, female sex, pre-morbid dependency, increased time to randomisation, prior major bleed, prior antiplatelet therapy and in those randomised to triple vs guideline antiplatelet therapy. More severe bleeding was associated with worse clinical outcomes across multiple physical, emotional and quality of life domains.Trial registration ISRCTN47823388 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodhouse et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA (n=3,096). Intensive antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole) vs. Guideline-based therapy (clopidogrel alone or combined aspirin and dipyridamole) was evaluated on Major or fatal bleeding (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.24-3.93, p=0.007). Intensive antiplatelet therapy significantly increased major or fatal bleeding compared to guideline therapy (HR 2.21) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: