There has been an increasing interest in using unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning for various classification problems. Previous work shows that unlabeled data can improve or degrade the classification performance depending on whether the model assumption matches the ground-truth data distribution, and also on the complexity of the classifier compared with the size of the labeled training set. We provide a new analysis on the value of unlabeled data by considering different distributions of the labeled and unlabeled data and showing the migrating effect for semi-supervised learning. Extensive experiments have been performed in the context of image retrieval applications. Our approach evaluates the value of unlabeled data from a new aspect and is aimed to provide a guideline on how unlabeled data should be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: